1792 Small Batch vs. Sweet Wheat #0026

Who makes it? Barton Distillery

Mash Bill Small Batch: 75% corn, 15% rye, 10% barley – it’s technically undisclosed but we found a place that posted it so…

Mash Bill Sweet Wheat: 75% corn, 15% Wheat, 10% malted barley – again undisclosed and this just our guess base on the info above

The Small batch came in at 93.7 proof while Sweet Wheat considerably less at 91.2. Being released from Barton Distillery that has been around since 1879 started by Thomas S. Moore and today is the oldest functioning distillery in Bardstown Kentucky. Interestingly the 1792 line started in 2002 and took it’s name for when Kentucky became a state. Originally it was named Ridgewood Reserve 1792 but Brown Forman was not happy about that because of their Woodford Reserve and then took them to court on the basis that the name was too similar and they won. So, they changed the name to 1792 Ridgemont Reserve and came with an 8 year statement. Still not good enough, they dropped the Ridgemont Reserve, kept 1792 and added Small Batch. They also dropped the age statement. Since then 1792 has made a name for itself and is the flagship premium brand for Barton Distillery. Here are a few other brands they make: Very Old Barton(which shows up in our video) Tom Moore, Kentucky Gentleman, Kentucky Tavern, Zachariah Harris and also made a deal with CostCo to create a Small Batch CostCo bottle for them. At the distillery they have 29 barrel aging warehouses, 22 other buildings, still and the Tom Moore Spring. They did run into a bit of bad luck in March of 2019 when the lost 120,000 gallons of would be bourbon after an equipment failure and half a warehouse collapsed.

Kris thought that on the nose 1792 Small Batch was fruity with a hint of berries, on the finish a little strong with a char oaky flavor. The addition of the ice cube is what it needed and brought more flavors and made it more palatable. Erik to thought it was fruity on the nose but not very oaky on the finish and said it was great and fantastic. Kris was reserving judgement until the Sweet Wheat was opened and on the nose it definitely more subtle. Not as fruity and more sugary. On the finish Kris thought it was sweeter, lighter and you could taste the wheat verse the high rye. Also much smoother. Erik thought just the opposite and thought that Sweet Wheat on the finish was stronger and on the nose agreed it was sweeter. In the end we both picked Sweet Wheat as our favorite but disagreed on whether is was worth a secondary price tag of 100. Kris said that he’d probably shell out the Benjamin where Erik would not especially knowing msrp is 35 and the most he’d pay is 40. In the end we both agreed that we’d keep 1792 in stock in our bar and Kris would be hiding the Sweet Wheat.

Kris gave the Small Batch a 6.5 and Sweet Wheat 7.5

Erik gave Small Batch a 6.5 and Sweet Wheat 6.8

How much: A bottle of 1792 Small Batch is pretty easy to find and usually around 30 dollars but Sweet Wheat is a bit harder to find. MSRP is 35 dollars but you’ll find it on the secondary market for around 100 dollars up to 120.

Other products by 1792: Full Proof, Bottle in Bond, Port Finished, High Rye and a line of Thomas Moore